Subscribe now!

Fill out the form below to signup to our blog newsletter and we'll drop you a line when new articles come up.

Our strict privacy policy keeps your email address 100% safe & secure.

Easy Login!
Connect with Facebook
Recent Comments
Facebook Fan Page
Adsense Content

Apes make apes, Humans make humans.

"Apes Look Like Apes"

Gen 1:24-26

24: And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
25: And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
26: And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

How does evolution explain this?  Why are the Laws of Biogenesis as they are?  Is it by chance or by design?

Consider the logic that animals can only breed kind after kind. There are many breeds of Dogs. From Great Danes to Chihuahuas, they are still Dogs. Likewise, from lions to house cats, cats are still cats.  Now consider that apes and monkeys only produce apes and monkeys.  Try as scientists may, they cannot find crossbreeding among the various kinds of animals.

If man came from monkeys or apes,

as some athiests claim, then why are there still apes and monkeys Even in cloning, it cannot be done.  Yes, man is comprised of various races but still man.  And man can breed with other races. Still humans beget humans. There are 3 main races, and 16 sub races, developed by cross marriage between the races. But if man came from Apes, why can he NOT cross breed with an ape or monkey? The movies about the planet of the apes are pure fiction, man alone was given charge of the planet.

Not apes…but Man is made after God kind,

but not yet spirit, as will be according to God’s promise. We are now only in a “Flesh Rehearsal” of becoming like God.  Only a few are called in this age to be the ruling class of God beings, and are to help direct the rest of mankind in fulfilling the purpose for our existence.  In other words, ” God is producing a family after the God kind!

To quote Christ in John 10:34-35 :

Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your law, ‘I SAID, “YOU ARE GODS” ‘? If He called them gods, to whom the word of God came (and the Scripture cannot be broken),

Apes do not receive the Word of God to the same end that humans do.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Ping.fm
  • Print

Related Posts:

  • Josh Brodt

    Max: I like what you had to say on your site, man. The argument from kinds is very convincing. However… and I almost hesitate to even say this, but I feel that I should bring it up: the name of your site may need rethinking. According to Webster, “alogical” means “opposed to or lacking in logic” (just as a Theist believes in God and an Atheist does not). I know that the site name is “A Logical…” but I still think that it may be a little misleading. I certainly don’t think it was your goal to be misleading – in fact, I think your goal to present logical apologetics is quite admirable – but I just thought I might warn you that non-believers who might go to your site may either 1. mock the site; or 2. feel deceived because of the name. Neither of which can be good for your cause – which, again, I wholeheartedly support! Anyway, just thought I should let you know. Have a great day!

  • http://alogicalchristianity.org Max Richey

    Thanks Josh. I always welcome an honest opinion. Honestly, the name has already occured to me, but, unfortunately, not until long after everything was in motion. Although changing the name is not impossible, it cannot be done without a complete overhaul of the entire plan (domain change, possibly moving the site, all new search engine and social networking plans, etc.)

    Your point is valid regarding the thought processes of unbelievers. But both God and I know it was not meant to be misleading. Funny thing is, it may actually serve to get more visits from unbelievers. Who knows? I am not terribly concerned about the mocking. I expect it, in fact. So, I’ll just have to leave the issue of perceived misleading in the hands of the Lord.

    Again, I really appreciate the opinion and certainly your expression of support. Be blessed!

    Oh yeah, and the point of kinds came from my older cousin, Dale. It is a point that has been kicked around in my family since I can remember. It was kind of cool to give one of my family members a chance to get it published.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Status Updates